Paper #6: Our hair
1. Our hair today is an intake mechanism:
The hair on our head and body is not just an irrelevant leftover from the days when our predecessor hominin species and very early homo ancestors were fully covered by hair.
Rather, the hair we have today is an INTAKE mechanism, for the taking in of nutrients to certain internal parts of the body that are located near the hair.
This is because, when these predecessor hominin species and very early homo ancestors were fully covered by hair, their hair served THREE purposes: (1) It kept them insulated against cold and heat, (2) It protected their skin against the rays of the Sun, and (3) It took in nutrients for certain internal parts of their body located near the hair.
As a result of our evolution:
(a) We have kept all of the hair that acts as an intake mechanism .. including the very fine hair on most parts of our skin, but
(b) With the sole exception of our head hair*, we have lost (as a result of wearing clothing) all of the hair that kept these predecessors and very early ancestors insulated against cold and heat and protected their skin against the rays of the Sun.
*Note: Only our head hair today continues to serve all three purposes: (1) It keeps the brain insulated against heat and cold, (2) It protects the skin on the top of the head against the rays of the Sun, and (3) It takes in nutrients for the brain and central nervous system.
It follows from these matters that:
(1) We should not apply to our head hair, other hair or skin (because most of our skin is covered by very fine hair) products that are toxic if swallowed, because the toxins are then taken into the body via the hair, and
(2) We should instead apply to our head hair, other hair and skin (because most of our skin is covered by very fine hair) natural products that are nutritious, so that the nutrients can then be taken in via the hair for the relevant internal part of the body located near the hair.
............
2. Evidence:
What is the evidence that all of our hair today is an intake mechanism for the taking in of nutrients to certain internal parts of the body located near the hair?
The evidence includes the following:
Evidence A: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why, when puberty arrives, both females and males grow hair under their armpits. This hair is not for the purpose of insulating the armpits against cold and heat.
Rather, it is needed by females to take in nutrients for the development of their breasts, for maintaining the health of their breasts, and for milk production. It is therefore not needed during their childhood.
Pubescent and post-pubescent males just have a male version of this underarm hair, in the same way that we have male nipples.
In nature, the nutrients that are taken in by the underarm hair on pubescent and post-pubescent females are the nutrients contained in the dead, dying and decomposing (and thus smelling) bodies of the harmful microorganisms that have been pushed out from the armpits, being one of the key skin exit areas for them. See Papers #2, #3 and #4.
But today's use on the armpits of antiperspirants and deodorants, as well as soaps and other antimicrobial personal hygiene products especially if any traces are left behind, blocks or largely blocks this exit of harmful microorganisms from the armpits. See Paper #4.
The use of these products on the armpits has two consequences: (1) The harmful microorganisms remain trapped inside the body where they cause harm (see Papers #2, #3 and #4), and (2) The toxins in these products are taken into the body via the underarm hair.
As explained in Point 2 of Paper #9, I think it is likely that consequence (1) above is the cause of many breast cancers and that the risk of breast cancer is further increased by consequence (2) above.
Evidence B: What I have said in Evidence A above also explains why women (or most women) naturally grow a lot more underarm hair than men (or most men) do. Most women trim, shave, wax or otherwise minimise* their underarm hair on a regular basis .. and so, their natural greater underarm hairiness is not apparent.
Whereas very few of us men have ever minimised our underarm hair, because we grow so little of it.
*Note: To maintain the health of the breasts, including minimising the risk of breast cancer, women should allow their underarm hair to grow to a reasonable length and they should apply to their underarm hair anything they can safely eat or drink .. so that the nutrients can then be taken into the breasts via the hair. Under no circumstances should they eliminate their underarm hair or minimise it to the point it is no longer visible. And under no circumstances should they apply to their armpits any products that are toxic. All currently (2014) available underarm antiperspirants and deodorants are toxic.
Evidence C: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why, when puberty arrives, both females and males grow pubic hair. This hair is not for the purpose of insulating the pubic area against cold and heat.
Rather, it is needed by both females and males to take in nutrients for their reproductive and sexual systems. It is therefore not needed during childhood.
Pubic hair is not for the purpose of protecting the external genital organs .. the female external genital organ (labia majora) is already well protected because of its position between the tops of the thighs .. and the male external genital organs (penis and scrotum) hang down lower than the pubic hair.
Evidence D: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why women (or most women) naturally grow a lot more pubic hair and nearby hair than men (or most men) do.
The female reproductive and sexual system .. that is, their system for carrying and nourishing eggs, ovulating, menstruating, mating, orgasming, conceiving, and then developing and giving birth to a child .. requires the intake of a lot more nutrients than the male reproductive and sexual system requires.
Again, most women trim, shave, wax or otherwise minimise* their pubic hair and nearby hair on a regular basis .. and so, their natural greater hairiness on these areas is not apparent.
Whereas most of us men only occasionally trim our pubic hair because, relative to women, we grow so little of it.
*Note: To maintain the health of the female reproductive and sexual system, including minimising the risk of ovarian or cervical cancers, women should allow their pubic and nearby hair to grow to a reasonable length and they should apply to this hair anything they can safely eat or drink .. so that the nutrients can then be taken into their reproductive and sexual system via the hair. Ditto for men. And under no circumstances should they apply to their pubic and nearby hair any products that are toxic. All currently (2014) available hair removal products are toxic.
Evidence E: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why the pubic hair on women is shaped differently to the pubic hair on men.
The pubic hair on women runs straight across because they have two ovaries, one on either side .. and their pubic hair is shaped straight across to take nutrients to their ovaries; as well as also being taken to their other reproductive and sexual organs.
Whereas the pubic hair on men does not run straight across but instead tapers upwards towards our belly button, because we do not have ovaries on either side. Instead, our pubic hair is shaped to take nutrients to our prostate, which is in the centre; as well as also being taken to our other reproductive and sexual organs.
Evidence F: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why an unborn child in the womb is fully covered by hair .. initially lanugo hair and then vellus hair. This hair takes in nutrients for its developing body. It is not for the purpose of insulating the unborn child against cold and heat. The unborn child is already perfectly insulated in the environment of the womb.
Evidence G: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why most newly born babies arrive with a full head of hair. This head hair has taken in nutrients for the developing brain of the unborn child. It has not been for the purpose of insulating the developing brain against cold and heat. Again, the developing brain is already perfectly insulated in the environment of the womb.
Evidence H: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why, from puberty, males grow a lot more facial hair than females. Our pubescent and post-pubescent male predecessors and ancestors did most of the hunting and fighting .. and their facial hair took in nutrients for their eyesight, hearing and sense of smell.
This hunting and fighting role of our male predecessors and ancestors also explains why, on the heavily muscled parts of the body .. in particular, the arms, legs and chest .. pubescent and post-pubescent males grow a lot more hair than females. The hair on these areas takes in nutrients for these muscles.
And this hunting and fighting role also explains why older men begin growing additional hair on our eyebrows, in our ears, on our ear lobes, and in our nostrils .. as our eyesight, hearing and sense of smell all enter decline. The growth of additional hair in these places does not happen to older women or happens to only a few of them. This additional hair took in nutrients for the eyesight, hearing and sense of smell of our older male predecessors and ancestors, enabling them to continue hunting and fighting notwithstanding their years .. and evolution has passed on to today's older males the trait of growing this additional hair.
Evidence I: Our hair as an intake mechanism explains why, with age or a major stress event including a major illness, our head hair turns grey .. that is, because the brain has sucked the nutrients (in particular, carbon) out of it. See Papers #7 and #8 and Point 8 of Paper #12.
............
3. Head hair:
As stated, our head hair today is the only remaining hair that insulates against heat and cold .. it helps to keep the brain at an even temperature .. and it protects the skin on the top of the head against the rays of the Sun.
And as stated, MOST importantly our head hair today also takes in nutrients for the brain and central nervous system.
You can test this by applying slightly salty (table salt) water to your head hair about two or three hours before you go to bed. It will be dry by the time you go to bed. You are likely to find it more difficult to fall asleep or to remain asleep; and you are likely to experience vivid dreams .. similar to the dreams experienced after eating chocolate or a rich dessert. This is because the brain has sucked in some of the salt from the hair.
Ditto if you soak your head hair with mineral water (either sparkling or flat) that has come from a natural source.
And ditto if you rub a vegetable oil, for example extra virgin olive oil, into your head hair.
After a shower, it is very important to let your clean head hair (that is, containing zero traces of any soap, shampoo or similar toxic product) dry naturally. Wet head hair absorbs chemical elements from the atmosphere, and these are then taken into the brain and central nervous system via the hair. Whereas dry head hair cannot do this.
Under no circumstances should you use a hair dryer.
There are two reasons for this: (1) The heat from the dryer may cause damage to the brain (either directly, or indirectly via the blood supply to the brain), and (2) Dry head hair is unable to attract the chemical elements from the atmosphere that are needed by the brain and central nervous system .. only wet hair can do this.
And under no circumstances should you apply to your head hair anything you cannot safely eat or drink. If you apply to your head hair products that are toxic* if swallowed, the toxins will be taken into the brain and central nervous system via the head hair.
*Note: Almost all currently (2014) available head hair products are toxic if swallowed, especially those that are used for dying the hair.
............
4. Underarm hair:
As explained in Points 3 and 4 of Paper #4, we should not apply to our armpits antiperspirants or deodorants, or wash our armpits with soap or other antimicrobial personal hygiene products especially if traces are left behind, because they block or partially block the natural exit, with sweat, of harmful microorganisms .. that is, both (a) The foreign microorganisms, pathogens (see Paper #2), and (b) The excess numbers of our natural microorganisms, microbiota, when they have multiplied too greatly (see Paper #3) .. from this key skin exit area for them.
There is a second reason for not applying or using these products on the armpits .. and that is because the toxins in them are then taken into the body via the underarm hair.
As stated in Evidence A in Point 2 above, the use of these products on the armpits has two consequences: (1) The harmful microorganisms remain trapped inside the body where they cause harm (see Papers #2, #3 and #4), and (2) The toxins in these products are taken into the body via the underarm hair.
As explained in Point 2 of Paper #9, I think it is likely that consequence (1) above is the cause of many breast cancers and that the risk of breast cancer is further increased by consequence (2) above.
And also see the *Note in Evidence B in Point 2 above.
............
5. Pubic hair:
Our predecessor hominin species and early homo ancestors did not wear clothes .. they were naked.
From the time these predecessor species stood upright and walked on two legs rather than four, they and then their successors (our early homo ancestors) sat or squatted for their meals, and thus they rested their food on their naked lap.
This enabled the nutrients in the food to enter their reproductive and sexual systems via their pubic hair.
Our pubic hair today serves this same purpose. It should not have applied to it toxic hair removal products, or other toxic products, because the toxins are then taken into the reproductive and sexual system via the hair.
Also see the *Note in Evidence D in Point 2 above.
And in order to have good reproductive and sexual health .. including: (a) Your fertility, (b) The quality of your sperm or eggs and thus the quality of your offspring, (c) The level of your sex drive, (d) The amount of blood flow to your sexual organs during sexual activity, and (e) Your sexual responses generally .. you should apply to your pubic hair anything you can safely eat or drink, the more nutritious* the better.
*Note: Extra virgin olive oil is especially good. Other nutritious and natural products that can be applied to the pubic hair include butter, dairy spreadable, dripping from grilled or roasted meat, and mineral water (either sparkling or flat) that has come from a natural source.
Males, especially those in middle or older age, will find the effects of applying extra virgin olive oil or other nutritious and natural products to their pubic hair will be quite dramatic in terms of increased sex drive, greater potency and the amount of semenal* fluid that is produced.
*Note: This adjective is spelt as "seminal" in books and articles. I have spelt it as "semenal" because the noun from which it derives is "semen".
I do not know for sure but I would expect that, for women who have not yet reached menopause**, the effects of applying nutritious and natural products to their pubic hair are likely to be even more dramatic than they are for men.
For women who have not yet reached menopause, I would expect that .. in addition to increased sex drive, greater blood flow to the sexual organs during sexual activity, and heightened sexual responses generally .. these effects are likely to include increased fertility, a delay in the onset of menopause and a delay in a number of aspects of the ageing process (for example, by retaining healthier skin, muscles, bones and hair) because the nutrients in these natural products will prolong the health of the eggs and the health of the ovaries, with consequential effects on the entire female hormonal system.
**Note: For women who have already reached menopause, I would expect these effects to still be noticeable .. but to be significantly less than they are likely to be for women who have not yet reached menopause.
............
6. Toxic products:
As stated, because our head hair and all the other hair on our body is an intake mechanism, and because most of our skin is covered by very fine hair, we should only apply to our head hair, other hair and skin those products that we can safely eat or drink. We should not apply products that are toxic* if swallowed, because the toxins are taken into the body via the hair.
*Note: As stated in Point 3 above, almost all currently (2014) available hair products are toxic, especially those that are used for dying the hair. And most currently (2014) available skin products are toxic.
............
7. New products:
I am confident it will be possible for medical research institutes, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare companies, cosmetic companies and other companies to develop NEW hair products and NEW skin products* that:
(1) Will be non-toxic if swallowed**, and
(2) Will provide the correct natural nutrients, to be taken in via the hair, for the relevant internal part of the body located near the hair, and
(3) Will not block or partially block the body’s natural ability to push out, with sweat (either visible or not), via the skin, harmful microorganisms .. that is, both: (a) The foreign microorganisms, pathogens (see Paper #2), and (b) The excess numbers of the natural microorganisms, microbiota, when they have multiplied too greatly (see Paper #3).
*Note: As stated in the *Note in Point 5 of Paper #4, I very much doubt it will be possible to develop new antiperspirants that will be safe .. because, by their nature, antiperspirants prevent sweating and therefore prevent the exit of harmful microorganisms with the sweat.
**Note: Although these products are not swallowed, they are taken into the body via the hair, including the very fine hair on most parts of our skin.
............
8. Need for medical research:
Because the above ideas are novel, they have not yet been examined and tested by medical science.
It is my hope that the ideas will soon be examined and tested by medical research institutes, hospitals, university medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, healthcare companies, cosmetic companies and other organisations.
............
9. Risk of possible adverse side-effects:
For all treatments recommended in this Paper #6, I repeat the warning in Point 3 of Paper #1:
"Almost all medical treatments carry with them the risk of possible adverse side-effects, either for all people or just for some people.
It is therefore VERY important that, before carrying out any of the treatments recommended in the papers, you first check with your Doctor that it will be safe for you to do.
This is especially important if you are very ill, if you are pregnant or might be pregnant, if you are elderly, or if you are taking any prescribed medication.
I am not a Doctor. And, as we all know, medical science is extremely complex. So, please make sure you first check with your Doctor before carrying out any of the recommended treatments.
And if, after commencing a treatment, you believe it might be causing an adverse side-effect, you should immediately stop the treatment and check with your Doctor."
............
That concludes Paper #6.
Next is Paper #7, in which I explain how to cure and prevent many mental health problems.
Please go to Paper #7 ...
............
Love one another and care for our planet,
Gee
Gee Ryan (Gerald)
16 November 2014
.................................................................
Care For Our Planet Couple (white faces), Gee Ryan (Gerald), 2016. H 36 inches x W 48 inches (91.44cm x 121.92cm). Mixed media on canvas. Art email address is gee@geeryan.com and art website is geeryan.com
.................................................................
Copyright © Gee Ryan Health Pty Ltd (ACN 602 767 868) 2014-2017
Email: gee@geeryanhealth.com
[Revision 14 February 2017]